The Hobbit is being made into a movie, with Peter Jackson signed on as executive producer. Also there will be a “sequel” of some sort. Trying to aim for first movie in 2010 and second in 2011 (which seems awfully far off).
Thoughts on this:
1 - the LOTR movies - This announcement has prompted the people who did not like the LOTR movies to come out and say so again. As you may be aware, I absolutely love the LOTR movies. Most of the people against the movies are mainly fans of the book (as I am as well) that can’t take any changes at all to the story as presented in the book. One comment I read the other day listed about 4 changes that he hated, one of which was the removal of the character Erkenbrand. ERKENBRAND. There are probably at least 10 more book characters not in the movie who were more important than Erkenbrand. (To refresh your memory: Erkenbrand led the Rohirrim to Helm’s Deep with Gandalf to rescue everyone trapped there; Eomer was at the battle the whole time. In the movie, Eomer was off somewhere and so was able to be the one who led the riders to the rescue.) Off the top of my head, I’d rather have seen Imrahil, Beregond, Cirdan, Glorfindel, Gildor, Elladan and Elrohir, Bill Ferny (though without the Scouring there’s no point in him), etc. If you’re going to complain about Erkenbrand, then you’re obviously not ever going to like any adaptation at all, and should just stick with the books in the first place.
There are changes from the books in the LOTR movies I don’t like, some that I’m more neutral on though I wouldn’t have done it that way myself (you know, if I were a screenwriter and director), some that I don’t really like but can see the necessity (the Scouring of the Shire chapter near the end is one of my favorite parts of the story, but I don’t know how well it would have worked on screen), and even some that I do like. But whatever the differences from the book story, the LOTR movies are absolutely wonderful. So I’m happy that they are going to do a Hobbit movie.
2 - continuity with the LOTR movies - The Hobbit is an entirely different type of story from LOTR. So the question when making a movie from it is do you stay with the style of the book, or do you stay with the style of the LOTR movies? I would bet that it stays with the LOTR movie style, and becomes a bit darker than the book. I’ll be interested to see how it goes.
There are a handful of cross-over characters: most notably Gandalf and Bilbo, also Gollum and Elrond. (Gloin is in the Fellowship book, and ostensibly is at the council in the FOTR movie, but wasn’t especially noticeable.) Ian McKellen absolutely needs to come back as Gandalf, as does Andy Serkis for Gollum. Hugo Weaving as Elrond would also be good. I don’t think Ian Holm would be able to reprise the Bilbo role; they made him look younger for a brief shot in the LOTR prologue, but if I remember correctly it involved stretching the skin on his face back and such, and while it worked for a 2 second shot it wouldn’t be workable for a full movie. So Bilbo can probably be recast.
It’s unsure if PJ et al. are going to direct or write, right now they are signed on as executive producers. If PJ still has a great deal of influence over the direction of the movie, I am ok with someone else directing — George Lucas didn’t direct Empire Strikes Back and that probably improved it. We’ll see how it goes.
One other person who absolutely needs to come back: Howard Shore, the composer. The music of the LOTR movies is incredible.
3 - the nebulous ’sequel’ - Some places say the “two movies” are just going to be The Hobbit split into two movies. With some expansion on the story I can see that. More common rumor is that the second movie is going to somehow cover the gap between The Hobbit and FOTR. I have to say I’m unsure about this. The whole point of LOTR is that it’s the sequel to The Hobbit. If there was anything interesting going on in those 60-ish years in between, the sequel would have started then. So unless we’re getting The Adventures of Tom Bombadil: The Musical! or something, I don’t know what exactly they’re planning on.
Another problem is that PJ et al. has no movie rights to anything of Tolkien’s outside of The Hobbit and LOTR. JRR himself sold the rights off decades ago, and they’ve bounced around since then, but anything else is still held by the Tolkien estate, which practically means Christopher Tolkien. Everything I’ve heard suggests Chris is extremely unlikely to want to sell movie rights to anything else. So I don’t know how it works, but it seems that if it’s not in the LOTR prologue or appendices, they can’t use it for this sequel movie. For example, there’s a short story in the Unfinished Tales collection, called “The Quest of Erebor”, I believe (possibly “for”, not “of”), that goes a long way towards reconciling some of the contradictions between The Hobbit and LOTR, but I guess they aren’t allowed to use anything like that. Or anything in the “Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age” section of The Silmarillion.
Still, I am excited. I hope it goes well; I’d rather it not be made, and let us have our LOTR movies, then have them put out a bad movie (or two) and ruin the taste of the trilogy (not that I’m drawing comparisons to The Phantom Menace or anything, no, not at all).
Completely coincidentally, I’m rewatching the LOTR movies: I had just finished FOTR the night before the news about The Hobbit came out. They’re still great.